The Presidium of the Supreme Court approved the first "big" review of judicial practice in 2023. In it, the judges banned the postponement of the last day falling on the weekend to appeal an administrative fine, clarified the rules of punishment for extremist publications in social networks and defended the right to privatize a plot under a house that is not suitable for living. Also included in this document were the positions of the Economic Board, which allowed to renew the lease of land for the completion of real estate and obliged to take into account the impact of corporate conflict on the company's transactions.
We summarize the work of the Supreme Court on the formation of uniform approaches in the courts in 2022. The Plenum of the Supreme Court adopted 38 resolutions, of which 11 are devoted to judicial practice. So, the Supreme Court explained the rules for repayment and removal of criminal records, analyzed crimes in the field of computer information and criminal liability for non-payment of alimony. The "civil" provisions relate to CTP and compensation for moral damage. In addition, in 2022, the Presidium of the Supreme Court approved two general reviews of practice (usually four per year) and eight thematic ones.
In the last week of 2022, President Vladimir Putin signed several dozen recently adopted laws. So, he allowed not to announce the motivational part of the verdict and to participate in the criminal process remotely. Processes involving military personnel will be suspended for the duration of hostilities. Administrative and criminal liability for foreign agents was tightened, and life imprisonment was imposed for sabotage.
The Review traditionally presents the practice of the Presidium and judicial collegiums of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, clarifications are given on the application of civil, administrative, criminal and other branches of legislation, procedural issues are considered.
According to Lebedev, in 2021, the courts stopped cases of administrative offenses against 13% of individual entrepreneurs and legal entities, and 15% were given the mildest administrative punishment in the form of a warning.
This procedure is necessary for many categories of disputes, but there are cases when it is not necessary to comply with it. Despite this, the courts can return the statement of claim because the parties did not try to solve the problem peacefully.
Georgy Sokolov's work on the notary's executive inscription has been published in the electronic appendix to the Russian Law Journal.
Our colleague Georgy Sokolov spoke about the current positions of judicial practice on court costs, which can be found on Zakon.ru
In the publication, the issues arising in practice related to the application of a court penalty (astreinte), enshrined in Article 308.3 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation are considered
The tax review included 1 dispute.
The bankruptcy review included 9 disputes, and the tax review included 2.
The bankruptcy review included 8 disputes.